|
|
2002-2007
CHILD DEVELOPMENT PLAN
January 2002
The Sierra County Child Care
Council (SCCCC) serves as the Local Child Care Planning Council
for Sierra County.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This plan is the
result of the vision and leadership of the members of the Sierra
County Child Care Council (SCCCC). Their commitment to quality
child care for all of Sierra County has guided all of the planning
results found in this document. Members are appointed by County
Board of Supervisors (CBS) and County Superintendent of Schools
(CSS).
Sierra County
Child Care Council Members
Child Care Providers
Charlene Kreeger, Sierra
Nevada Children's Services (CBS)
Pam Filippini, Toddler Towers (CSS)
Consumers
Vacant (CBS)
Vacant (CSS)
Public Agency Representatives
Anne Berardi, Child Protective Services (CBS)
Linda Guffin, Sierra County Office of Education (CSS)
Community Representatives
Paul Guffin, United Methodist Church (CBS)
Vacant (CSS)
Discretionary Representatives
Vacant (CBS)
John Ringwald, Sierra Cascade Family Opportunities, Inc., Head
Start (CSS)
Sierra County Child Care Council Staff
Pamela Worden, Coordinator
Social Entrepreneurs,
Inc, a company dedicated to improving the abilities and capabilities
of human service organizations and thereby improving the quality
of life for individuals and communities, provided support and
guidance throughout the planning process. SEI can be contacted
at 6121 Lakeside Drive, Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 324-4567, or
on the Internet at http://www.socialent.com.
This Project was
made possible through funding from the California Department
of Education, Child Development Division.
SIERRA COUNTY
CHILD CARE
COUNCIL
Child
Development Plan
Table
of Contents
Executive
Summary *
Background
*
Child
Care Legislation *
Sierra
County Child Care Council *
Mission,
Vision, Guiding Principles *
Mission
Statement *
Vision
*
Guiding
Principles *
Stakeholders
*
Planning
Process *
Planning
Objectives *
Creation
of the Child Development Plan *
Situational
Analysis *
Strategic
Assessment *
Sierra
County Child Care Trends and Needs *
Focus
Areas, Goals and Objectives *
Goals
and Objectives *
Partnerships
*
Strategies
for Achieving Goals and Objectives *
Implementation
Plan *
Evaluation
Process *
Conclusion
*
Appendices
*
A. Child Care Council Membership List
*
B.
Meeting Summaries *
C.
Resources *
D.
Glossary *
Sierra
County Child Care Council
Child
Development Plan
Executive Summary
Congress enacted the Child
Care and Development Block Grant and the Title IV-A
At-Risk Child Care
Program in 1990 with the purpose of increasing the availability,
affordability and quality of child care throughout the United
States. In July 1991, the California Department of Education
offered funding to each county to establish a Local Child Care
Planning Council (LPC) with the purpose of developing countywide
priorities for child care and development services needed by
low-income families.
The Sierra County
Child Care Council (SCCCC) was established to develop local priorities
for child care through the Federal Child Care and Development
Block Grant (CCDBG). The Sierra County Child Care Council,
referred to throughout this plan as the council or SCCCC, determines
and plans for local community child care needs by performing
a situational analysis and developing a countywide child care
Child Development Plan.
The Sierra County
Child Care Council is a collaboration of consumers, service providers,
public agencies and other community representatives working together
to assess and coordinate the delivery of quality child care services
and programs. The 2002-2007 Child Development Plan is the first
five-year workplan adopted by the Sierra County Child Care Council,
and represents months of research, planning and assessment. The
plan is anchored in: 1) the mission to serve as a catalyst
in mobilizing resources designed to meet child care needs in
Sierra County; 2) the vision that Sierra County; and,
3) eight guiding principles. The guiding principles of
the SCCCC are to:
1. be a well informed
Local Child Care Planning Council that values teamwork, professionalism,
accountability, diversity, personal and professional development,
commitment and dedication, innovation and leadership;
2. respect and value
the dignity, worth, and uniqueness of each individual child and
family;
3. focus the public's
attention on the rights and needs of children;
4. bring into
active collaboration all individuals and groups concerned with
children;
5. promote a well-qualified,
well-compensated core of child care and early education professionals
who care for children;
6. encourage continuous
professional growth of child care and early education providers;
7. commit to a high
quality child care and early education system that is inclusive,
diverse, flexible and which involves parents; and,
8. establish resources
to help all parents access quality child care.
The 2002-2007 Child
Development Plan was developed through a three-phase approach
comprised of a Situational Analysis to determine major
needs and assets related to child care within the community;
a Strategic Assessment to determine the direction to take
to enhance child care quality and access; and the development
of an Implementation Plan, which outlines specific steps
and accountability measures necessary to achieve desired results.
The Situational Analysis
included two facilitated sessions which SCCCC members identified
the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats which impact
the degree to which all children in Sierra County receive quality
child care services appropriate to each child's needs. Periodically,
throughout the planning process, the contents of the Situational
Analysis were reviewed and revised to reflect the changing circumstances
of child care services and needs in Sierra County.
The Strategic Assessment
began by identifying other resources that would help the council
understand the unique circumstances affecting children in Sierra
County. Source documents were reviewed to compare data with the
key points of the situational analysis. Once agreement was reached
on the data and strengths as well as areas for improvement, the
council engaged in strategic planning to create the Child Development
Plan. This included defining long-term goals, intermediate objectives
for the next one to three years and developing strategies to
achieve the goals and objectives of the plan.
As goals, strategies
and strategic relationships were defined; SCCCC evaluated and
prioritized the goals and took a further look at the action steps
necessary to achieve those goals. This became the foundation
for the Implementation Plan. The Implementation Plan is intended
to be a management and accountability tool which can be used
by SCCCC to organize and track the work of the SCCCC and its
progress toward the goals found in the Child Development Plan.
The complete list
of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats identified
by the council is found in the Situational Analysis section of
this plan. Some of the issues noted include:
Identified strengths
related to child care in Sierra County involve the enactment
of the Children and Families Act of 1998 (Proposition 10), and
the impact it has had within the county in terms of services
and support, which include plans for children and families centers
in Downieville and Loyalton.
A lack of licensed
child care homes and centers in certain geographic areas throughout
the county was identified as a weakness and impacted council
decisions in developing the plan. A substitute pool of qualified
child care providers does not exist and has been identified as
a weakness.
The council wished
to capitalize on opportunities including both the trend in Sierra
County for increased collaboration without duplication of resources,
and college-based credit classes through distance learning.
The county is facing
barriers in terms of child care providers including the stringent
requirements of Desired Results Instruments (DRI) testing for
compliance that could result in providers choosing to leave the
profession.
The Strategic Assessment
process evaluated the issues identified by the council and
compared those issues to the data available regarding Sierra
County. This data included US Census figures, results of the
Children and Families Commission Needs Assessment, and the latest
economic and demographic data published on the county. Together
this information laid the foundation for identifying the areas
upon which the council will focus its efforts.
As a result of the
assessment and analysis phases, the SCCCC 2002-2007 Child Development
Plan is designed to impact four focus areas:
|
Focus Area |
A |
Collaboration Enhancing
and Focusing Stakeholder Efforts |
|
|
|
|
|
Focus Area |
B |
Quality Care Professional
Development and Training |
|
|
|
|
|
Focus Area |
C |
Capacity/Retention Across
all Types of Care Settings |
|
|
|
|
|
Focus Area |
D |
Council Development/Effectiveness |
Within those four focus areas
the SCCCC has seven goals:
|
Goal |
A.1 |
Collaboration among stakeholders
will be enhanced and focused, thereby improving outcomes for
child care and the child care system. |
|
Goal |
B.1 |
The variety of quality trainings
to providers will be broad and flexible enough in order that
all providers will participate. |
|
Goal |
B.2 |
Child care providers will have
the tools to meet the diverse child and family needs within Sierra
County. |
|
Goal |
C.1 |
Child care providers will receive
compensation/benefits/incentives that encourage and enable them
to stay in the profession. |
|
Goal |
D.1 |
The community will look to SCCCC
to identify child care needs and set priorities for the county. |
|
Goal |
D.2 |
The discrepancies experienced
by being a sparsely populated, rural county will be reduced. |
|
Goal |
D.3 |
SCCCC members will be knowledgeable
about their roles and responsibilities to the council and to
the community, and about child care and the child care profession. |
The intent is for this Child
Development Plan to be utilized by the Sierra County Child Care
Council and other organizations and planning groups to guide
actions, make informed decisions, and coordinate efforts among
the various stakeholder groups. By using the plan in this way,
Sierra County can improve the quality, affordability and access
to care for children.
BACKGROUND
This section is designed to
provide a general understanding of the Sierra County Child Care
Council, how the council was formed, and what it seeks to accomplish.
Included is the context and historical perspective which led
to the current planning process. Hopefully, it will enhance understanding
by providing the framework for readers who were not involved
in creating the plan.
Child
Care Legislation
The Child Care and Development
Block Grant and the Title IV-A At-Risk Child Care Program were
enacted in 1990 by Congress under the Omnibus Reconciliation
Act of 1990, (Public Law 101-508). The purposes of the new federal
child care programs were to increase the availability, affordability
and quality of child care throughout the United States. Administration
of the Child Care and Development Block Grant within California
was awarded to the California Department of Education by Governor
Pete Wilson. In July 1991, the California Department of Education
offered funding to each county to establish a Local Child Care
Planning Council (LPC) for the purpose of developing countywide
priorities for child care and development services needed by
low-income families.
Sierra
County Child Care Council
The Sierra County Child Care
Council was formed as the state-mandated LPC in 1991 to develop
county-specific priorities for Sierra County related to issues
of child care and other associated services needed by low-income
families in the county. SCCCC did not have funding other than
the original block grant allocation from the Department of Education.
It met sporadically at that time, mainly providing networking
and information sharing opportunities for members.
The council struggled
in the beginning because there were few resources to actually
implement the changes that were identified as priorities by the
council.
In August 1997, AB
1542 was passed mandating that each county in California establish
a formal Local Child Care Planning Council. The new law
required the involvement of both the County Board of Supervisors
and the County Office of Education. More specific responsibilities
and mandates were added to law as part of the legislation creating
Californias response to federal welfare reform (CalWORKs),
and additional funding was identified. In 1999, the Legislature
and Governor were convinced that Local Child Care Planning Councils
had become an important part of the local government infrastructure
at the county level and should be provided with stable, ongoing
funding.
The current SCCCC
is a ten-member council with representation from child care providers,
consumers, community members, public agencies and other discretionary
members. There are currently four vacancies on the council. Many
council members have been involved in issues of child care in
Sierra County for a number of years. In fact, one member of today's
council has been a member since its inception.
Mission,
Vision, Guiding Principles
The Child Development Plan
is rooted in the mission, vision and guiding principles of the
council. The mission articulates the fundamental purpose
for the council to exist; the vision provides a broad
description of the kind of future the council is trying to create;
and the guiding principles are the core values and beliefs
that guide all activities of the organization. When used together
these elements provide direction and give meaning to all of the
work necessary to make the organization flourish.
Mission Statement
The
mission of the Sierra County Child Care Council is to serve as
a catalyst in mobilizing resources designed to meet child care
needs in Sierra County.
Vision
Sierra
County provides quality child care services appropriate to each
child's needs.
Guiding
Principles
The guiding principles of the
SCCCC are to:
be
a well-informed Local Child Care Planning Council that values
teamwork, professionalism, accountability, diversity, personal
and professional development, commitment and dedication, innovation
and leadership;
respect and value the dignity,
worth, and uniqueness of each individual child and family;
focus the public's attention
on the rights and needs of children;
bring into active collaboration
all individuals and groups concerned with children;
promote a well-qualified, well-compensated
core of child care and early education professionals who care
for children;
encourage continuous professional
growth of child care and early education providers;
commit to a high quality child
care and early education system that is inclusive, diverse, flexible
and which involves parents; and,
establish resources to help
all parents access quality child care.
Stakeholders
Although the membership of
the council provides a strong foundation of knowledge and expertise,
the council is interested in countywide involvement and representation
during the planning process and beyond, to ensure that a thorough
and thoughtful plan is developed and implemented. One of the
key steps in the planning process was to identify stakeholders
and the best means to involve them. For purposes of this planning
effort, a stakeholder is any person or group who is directly
served by the results of the Child Development Plan or who has
a significant vested interest in the outcomes of the planning
process. The stakeholder groups and the roles the groups play
are shown below.
|
Stakeholders |
Stakeholder Roles |
|
1. Families with children
2. Licensed and exempt child care providers
3. Family Literacy
4. Sierra County Children & Families Commission (Prop10)
5. Sierra Nevada Children's Services
6. Sierra County Office of Education
7. Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District
8. Sierra-Plumas School Board of Trustees
9. Sierra County Board of Supervisors
10. Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Advisory Board
11. Sierra County Department of Health and Human Services
12. Sierra County Child Abuse Council
13. Faith-based Community
14. Mountain Circle Family Services
15. Alta California Regional Center
16. Rainbow
17. Head Start
18. Lassen, Feather River, and Sierra Community Colleges
19. Private Individuals, Organizations and Civic Groups
20. Primary Health Care Providers
21. Law Enforcement including Probation and Animal Control
22. California Division of Community Care Licensing
23. Volunteer Fire Departments/ Emergency Medical Technicians/Emergency
Responders
|
1. Information Exchange. Provide necessary data
and information during the situational analysis and strategic
assessment phases to ensure that accurate, current and relevant
data is obtained and used in developing Sierra County's needs
and priorities and continue to exchange data after the completion
of the plan.
2. Coordination and Partnering. Review the Child
Development Plan goals, objectives and strategies to identify
opportunities for leveraging efforts and resources.
3. Review and response to Strategic Assessment. At
various points, review, respond and provide feedback on objectives,
strategies, partners, etc.
4. Co-sponsor specific projects or events. Identify
specific activities within the Child Development Plan and partner
with the Local Child Care Planning Council to achieve results.
5. Meet multiple mandates. Coordinate and combine
efforts wherever possible to meet similar mandates related to
children/child care.
6. Funding and Other Resources. Provide funding
and other resources (i.e., in-kind professional services, access
to facilities, trainings, etc.) to support child care and the
child care system.
|
Planning Process
From April 2001through January
2002 the members of the Sierra County Child Care Council engaged
in a series of planning activities to create the SCCCC's 2002-2007
Child Development Plan. A summary of the planning process is
captured here so readers/future council members can understand
the objectives of planning, how the plan was created, the level
of participation, and the various considerations and thought
processes that went into the final Child Development Plan document.
The SCCCC was committed
to taking the time to engage in thoughtful consideration of the
issues impacting child care throughout Sierra County and crafting
a plan that can act as a road map for strengthening and supporting
quality, affordable child care choices for the community.
A summary of meetings
is contained in Appendix B.
Planning
Objectives
The primary objectives of the
planning process are to:
communicate to the public the
future goals and the direction of the council;
create a countywide tool for
addressing child care needs;
advise, inform and consult
with other stakeholders on issues regarding child care; and,
define and establish the council's
role in relation to the human and social services in the county.
Creation of the Child Development
Plan
The planning process consisted
of three major phases: Situational Analysis, Strategic Assessment,
and Implementation Plan.
Situational Analysis. The Situational Analysis included
two facilitated sessions in which SCCCC members identified strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities and barriers that impact the degree
to which all children in Sierra County receive quality child
care services appropriate to each child's needs. Periodically,
throughout the planning process, the contents of the Situational
Analysis were reviewed and revised to reflect the changing circumstances
of child care services and needs in Sierra County.
Strategic Assessment. The Strategic Assessment began
by identifying other resources that would help the council understand
the unique circumstances affecting children in Sierra County.
Source documents were reviewed to compare data with the key points
of the situational analysis. Once agreement was reached on data,
strengths, and areas to improve, the council engaged in strategic
planning to create the Child Development Plan. The major activities
of this phase included:
defining long-term goals or
statements of desired change over the next five years;
defining intermediate objectives
which are the precise changes sought in the next one to three
years;
developing strategies or the
overall approaches or methods by which the Child Development
Plan's goals and objectives will be achieved; and,
defining the strategic relationships
of import within Sierra County. These include the interconnected
groups of parents, providers, business, government, and children
and family services providers key to the success of a long-range
plan.
Implementation
Plan.
As goals, strategies and strategic relationships were defined,
SCCCC evaluated and prioritized the goals and took a further
look at the action steps necessary to achieve those goals. This
became the foundation for the Implementation Plan. The Implementation
Plan is intended to be a management and accountability tool that
will be used by SCCC to organize and track its work and progress
toward the goals found in the Child Development Plan.
Situational
Analysis
A summary of the Situational
Analysis developed in discussions with the SCCCC is as follows:
Strengths of Sierra
County Related to Child Care:
Prop 10s positive impact
on child care in Sierra County through leadership, funding priorities,
and value placed on child care;
Prop 10 partially funded a
day care center in Goodyears Bar;
Prop 10 funded, and United
Methodist Church provided space for, a playgroup in Downieville;
Prop 10's Retention Grant for
ECE/Child Development stipends, site development, and educational
support;
Family Child Care Home providers'
retention many have provided care continuously for a long
period of time, offering stability for children and families;
Sierra County Office of Education
Special Education Preschool;
small county (everyone knows
each other);
higher family child care rates
charged by providers in Loyalton result in provider retention
and sustainable services;
accredited classes through
Feather River and Lassen Community Colleges;
experienced "grandmother-types"
as informal care providers for children;
Family Resource Center in Loyalton;
increased awareness of assets
and collaboration within the community;
Sierra County Mental Health
Department's staffing and implementation of Children's System
of Care;
Head Start;
Toddler Towers Child Care Center;
and,
Child Care Resource and Referral
Agency located in Loyalton and Downieville.
Weaknesses:
insufficient licensed care
availability: on west side, there are only two licensed child
care homes and one child care center (pending); on the east side,
there are only three licensed family child care homes and one
child care center;
because of lack of staff, resources,
and/or training, there is a lack of services for children with
multiple or severe disabilities;
no licensed providers offering
"non-traditional hours" of care;
Family Child Care Homes or
center-based care providers are unable to take advantage of educational
opportunities because a substitute pool of qualified care providers
doesn't exist;
lack of potential child care
sites that could meet health and safety licensing regulations;
few regulations attached to
license-exempt care;
no financial support for families
with incomes above the subsidy threshold;
requirement that subsidy reimbursement
rate is equitable, and licensed providers' willingness to hold
rates down for sake of families not receiving subsidies results
in lower income for providers;
Sierra County, as a small rural
county, does not meet eligibility requirements to apply for grants
or other funding supports available in California;
licensed providers, primarily
on the west side of the county, are paid less than exempt/informal
care providers, yet they have to meet higher standards/training
requirements;
higher overhead costs for child
care centers (as opposed to home care, exempt/informal care)
discourage establishment/expansion of centers;
lack of understanding about
SCCCC; and,
only three locations (Auburn,
Chico and Susanville) are available to Sierra County residents
for licensing orientation, which can mean a 150-mile plus distance
to travel.
Opportunities:
proposed location for children
and families center in Loyalton and the Downieville area;
recruit more home providers
while keeping balance between supply and demand for care;
Head Start expanded recruiting
for home-based preschoolers in the west side;
trends in Sierra County for
increased collaboration without duplication of resources;
ongoing opportunities for college-based
credit classes through distance learning; and,
increased training opportunities
for providers as a result of implementing the Desired Results
Instrument (DRI).
Barriers:
Sierra Pacific Mill closing
has reduced the number of qualified child care workers;
supply of providers and demand
for child care fall in and out of balance;
loss of families receiving
subsidies to pay for care could result in loss of revenue for
centers, and potential closings;
families migrating into Sierra
County from higher income areas driving up the cost of child
care;
stringent requirements of DRI
testing/compliance could result in providers not offering care
for children receiving subsidies;
reduced subsidy dollars coming
into Sierra County due to reduced child population would make
it difficult for providers to stay in business; and,
providers leaving child care
for other higher-paid professions.
This information
was compared to and evaluated in the context of other known information
about Sierra County. The council used the Situational Analysis
as a starting point to engage in a strategic assessment of Sierra
County's Child Development Needs. The results were then incorporated
into the plan.
Strategic
Assessment
After reviewing a variety of
data and resources related to Sierra County, some key points
were used to make sense of the needs and assets of the county
related to child development.
Sierra County Child Care Trends
and Needs
General
The total 1998 population of
Sierra County was 3,403. By 2000, it had increased to 3,555.
In population, Sierra County is the second smallest of California's
counties. Towns in Sierra County include: Alleghany, Calpine,
Downieville, Goodyears Bar, Loyalton, Pike, Sattley, Sierra City
and Sierraville.
The following are
facts about the people found in Sierra County from the 2000 Census:
|
Sierra
County People Facts |
Sierra
County |
California |
|
Population, 2000 |
3,555 |
33,871,648 |
|
Population, percent
change, 1990 to 2000 |
+7.1% |
+13.6% |
|
Persons under 5 years
old, percent, 2000 |
4.1% |
7.3% |
|
Persons under 18 years
old, percent, 2000 |
23.3% |
27.3% |
|
Persons 65 years old
and over, percent, 2000 |
17.7% |
10.6% |
|
White persons, percent,
2000 (a) |
94.2% |
59.5% |
|
Black or African American
persons, percent, 2000 (a) |
0.2% |
6.7% |
|
American Indian and
Alaska Native persons, percent, 2000 (a) |
1.9% |
1.0% |
|
Asian persons, percent,
2000 (a) |
0.2% |
10.9% |
|
Native Hawaiian and
Other Pacific Islander, percent, 2000 (a) |
0.1% |
0.3% |
|
Persons reporting some
other race, percent, 2000 (a) |
1.0% |
16.8% |
|
Persons reporting two
or more races, percent, 2000 |
2.4% |
4.7% |
|
Female population, percent,
2000 |
49.5% |
50.2% |
|
Persons of Hispanic
or Latino origin, percent, 2000 (b) |
6.0% |
32.4% |
|
White persons, not of
Hispanic/Latino origin, percent, 2000 |
90.3% |
46.7% |
|
Housing units, 2000 |
2,202 |
12,214,549 |
|
Homeownership rate,
2000 |
70.7% |
56.9% |
|
Households, 2000 |
1,520 |
11,502,870 |
|
Persons per household,
2000 |
2.32 |
2.87 |
|
Households with persons
under 18 years, percent, 2000 |
29.5% |
39.7% |
|
Median household money
income, 1997 model-based estimate |
$34,941 |
$39,595 |
|
Persons below poverty,
percent, 1997 model-based estimate |
11.6% |
16.0% |
|
Children below poverty,
percent, 1997 model-based estimate |
15.2% |
24.6% |
(a) Includes
persons reporting only one race.
(b) Hispanics
may be of any race, so also are included in applicable race categories.
Poverty
The county has the lowest statewide
percentage of young children living in poverty. According to
Children Now, 10.6% of Sierra County's children ages 0 to17 live
in poverty.
Sierra County has
one of the highest rates of children eligible for Women Infants
and Children (WIC) nutrition services who actually receive those
services.
A review of free
and reduced lunch information for October 2001 indicated the
number of children receiving assistance at schools. There is
a considerable variance in the numbers receiving free or reduced
lunches, ranging from 21% to 56% percent of students, depending
on the school:
Sierraville reported that 28%
of its meals were free or provided at a reduced rate. This amounted
to an average of 6 out of the 22 students who received meals
from the cafeteria o a daily basis.
Pliocene Ridge reported that
56% of its meals were free or provided at a reduced rate. This
amounted to an average of 36 out of the 65 students who received
meals from the cafeteria o a daily basis.
Loyalton reported that 29%
of its meals were free or provided at a reduced rate. This amounted
to an average of 181of the 617 students who received meals from
the cafeteria o a daily basis.
Downieville reported that 21%
of its meals were free or provided at a reduced rate. This amounted
to and average of 24 of the 106 students who received meals from
the cafeteria on a daily basis.
Child Care
The amount of licensed
care available is insufficient: on west side, there are only
two licensed child care homes and one child care center (pending);
on the east side, there are only three licensed family child
care homes and one child care center.
The average cost
to families for preschool in Sierra County in 2002 was estimated
at $184 per month per child. For those families who achieve the
average median income, this translates into 6.3% of their income,
per child.
Knowledge of families
about available financial assistance varies widely throughout
the county.
Children and
Families
Based on the Children
and Families Commission Needs Assessment (dated July, 2000) and
the experience of the SCCCC, a number of needs and trends were
identified:
percentage of children being
cared for in licensed-exempt, relative-care settings is in general
higher than the rest of the state;
lack of infant care countywide;
need for affordable child care;
lack of licensed providers
on the west side;
uneven distribution of child
care settings throughout the county;
need for non-traditional care
settings for: children with short-term illnesses; special needs
children; and, non-traditional hours of care; and,
need for more financial assistance
for working women and families with annual income of less than
$25,000.
Health
There is no hospital
within Sierra County. Therefore, most women travel to Truckee,
Grass Valley or Reno to give birth. This impacts their confidence
level related to prenatal care, as well as well-baby care.
Figures reported
by the County Department of Health indicate the birth rate for
the county is approximately 25 births per year. Consistently,
Sierra County has experienced few low birth weight babies, and
no infant mortality cases.
The County Department
of Health uses immunization rates as an indicator of county health.
Rates are tracked for children in child care, entering kindergarten,
and entering seventh grade. The data for 2000 shows that 100%
of children in child care were fully immunized; 78% of children
entering kindergarten were admitted with full immunizations,
while another 18% were entered conditionally (not all immunizations
in place at the time of admission); 68% of children entering
seventh grade were fully immunized (2nd Measles, Mumps,
and Rubella vaccination and Hepatitis B), while another 25% of
seventh graders were admitted conditionally.
Services
There are a number
of services available in Sierra County, and some of those are
described below.
Sierra Cascade
Family Opportunities, Inc.
has a Head Start program that serves 12 families in Sierra County
using the home-based model. Currently, Sierra Cascade is working
to recruit families in Sierra Valley, Sierra City, Downieville
and Goodyears Bar.
Toddler Towers, a child care center based
in Loyalton, is licensed for 21 pre-school children. They have
a waiver to care for school age children due to the lack of available
services for that age group. Their services include preschool,
school-age care, respite care, and transportation to and from
school. They are funded through a combination of client fees,
CalWORKs, child care subsidy programs, and social service funds
Sierra Nevada
Children's Services (SNCS)
provides support to families and child care providers in Nevada
and Sierra Counties. SNCS maintains offices in both Downieville
and Loyalton. Services include:
Resource and Referral
Program
The Child Care Resource
and Referral Program is a free service available to all families
regardless of income. The program helps parents locate child
care services which meet their needs and those of their children.
Parents are informed about the types of child care options available
to them and are provided with a guide to choosing quality services.
The program is part of a statewide effort that includes 62 resource
and referral agencies in 58 counties.
Child Development
Library
Each office maintains
a lending library open to parents and providers. The library
contains many educational toys, books and training videos on
topics of interest to parents and caregivers.
Child Care Licensing
The offices provide
information regarding the licensing process. For caregivers exempt
from licensure, SNCS will assist with the TrustLine registration
process. TrustLine is a registry of Child Care providers who
have been cleared by the Department of Justice.
Child Care Provider
Training
SNCS offers training
and support to caregivers. Each office has established resource
libraries equipped with educational toys, books, videos and curriculum
materials. SNCS publishes a caregiver newsletter and facilitates
a caregiver support group.
Subsidized Child
Care Costs
SNCS administers
a variety of child care subsidy programs. These programs offer
families of low and moderate incomes financial support to offset
the cost of child care. Eligibility is determined by income in
relation to family size. Staff assists parents through the enrollment
process, provides child care referrals, and offers ongoing support
and information while respecting the parent's right to make decision
regarding their children's well-being.
Sierra County Child
Care Council
SCNS is the fiscal
and administrative manager, and houses the SCCCC in Downieville.
The Sierra County
Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10) Improving access to quality
child care services is a primary objective of the SCCFC. It has
allocated funds for development of Children and Families Centers
in Loyalton and the Downieville area; developed and implemented
a Child Care Workers Compensation and Retention Project, which
funds stipends, site development, and educational support for
care providers; and, supports programs that provide services
to children, families, and care providers (e.g., literacy, safety
education).
Sierra County
Office of Education
The Office of Education provides special education services for
children 0 to 5 years old. This includes one preschool classroom
at the Loyalton Elementary School, preschool services available
to eligible children in a variety of settings throughout the
county, and Early Start for infants and toddlers in their homes.
The largest percentage of children served with special needs
fall into the speech and language categories.
Focus Areas, Goals and Objectives
After reviewing the child development
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and barriers found in Sierra
County, the council examined the resources and indicators noted
in the Strategic Assessment to set priorities for the Child Development
Plan. As a result of the prioritization, as well as other planning
efforts, the SCCCC developed four focus areas, with seven goals
and twelve objectives.
The four main areas
the SCCCC will strategically focus its efforts over the next
five years are:
A. Collaboration;
B. Quality Care;
C. Retention/Capacity;
and,
D. Council Development
& Effectiveness.
The council used
these four focus areas to develop goals and objectives for the
plan. Once the goals and objectives were agreed upon, the council
developed strategies to achieve the goals.
For the purpose of
this Child Development Plan, a goal is a long-range (five-year)
statement of desired change, based upon the vision statement.
An objective
is a precise description of the desired change that is short-term
(one to three years) and measurable, and that supports the achievement
of the goal.
Goals and Objectives
Once the focus areas were agreed
upon, the SCCCC established seven goals. For each goal, one to
three objectives were created.
The goals and objectives
were reviewed, revised, and refined during the planning process
to ensure the most important areas of need were addressed, and
that the goals and objectives support the vision of the council.
Goals
and Objectives
|
Focus Area A: Collaboration
Enhancing and Focusing Stakeholder Efforts |
|
Goals |
Objectives |
A.1 Collaboration among stakeholders
will be enhanced and focused, thereby improving outcomes for
child care and the child care system.
|
A.1.1. By Fall 2003, SCCCC will
work with all stakeholders to identify available resources/gaps,
and make recommendations for addressing identified needs.
|
|
Focus Area B: Quality
Care Professional Development and Training |
|
Goals |
Objectives |
B.1.1. By Fall 2002, a qualified
pool of substitute providers will be in place and available to
providers.
|
|
B.1.2.
By Fall 2003, all child care providers will be able to attend
quality trainings.
|
|
B.2 Child care providers will
have the tools to meet the diverse child and family needs within
Sierra County.
|
B.2.1 By Spring 2002, all existing
providers will receive training in providing care for special
needs children and a process for providing ongoing technical
assistance and support will be in place.
|
|
Focus Area C: Capacity/Retention
Across all Types of Care Settings |
|
Goals |
Objectives |
C.1.1. By Fall 2005, all providers
will engage in conversation about compensation benefits.
|
|
C.1.2.
By Fall 2004, SCCCC will produce and disseminate a report to
the community that documents the beneficial impact of the child
care profession in Sierra County.
|
|
C.1.3.
SCCCC will engage in conversation and advocacy activities at
least four times per year with funding sources, providers and
other key stakeholders about new/ongoing retention efforts at
the local and state levels.
|
|
|
Focus Area D: Council
Development / Effectiveness |
|
Goals |
Objectives |
D.1
The community will look to SCCCC to identify child care needs
and set priorities for the county.
|
D.1.1. By December of each year
the SCCCC will inform the community about the state of child
care in Sierra County.
|
D.2.1.
By February 2003, meet with stakeholders to begin development
of a countywide advocacy plan on behalf of child care providers/system.
|
|
D.2.2.
By the Fall 2002 Children's Summit, the SCCCC will identify state-level
advocacy opportunities that will benefit child care, with special
emphasis on unique circumstances and /or opportunities (e.g.
CCCCA, Rural Caucus of the CCAFA), and by March 2003,
will implement an engagement plan.
|
|
D.3.1.
By May 2002, 100% of council members will receive training/ orientation
about their roles and responsibilities, and will acknowledge
their commitment to the council.
|
|
D.3.1.
100% of council members will annually participate in ongoing
council development training.
|
|
Partnerships
The success of this Child Development
Plan is largely dependent on the stakeholders who deliver much
needed services to children within Sierra County. Equally important
are the relationships among the stakeholders, as they form the
safety net that supports the children and families they seek
to serve. The council developed and evaluated their goals and
objectives, and then tested them by considering the relationships
necessary to achieve results.
The purpose of describing
partner relationships is to help the SCCCC create a matrix or
"map" of current or planned relationships between the
SCCCC and its many local, regional and/or state constituents.
The "map" shows the interconnected web of relationships
within the child care system, and assists the council and its
partners in recognizing and building on existing strengths.
Partners are those
agencies, individuals, and/or groups that must work together
to ensure positive outcomes for Sierra County's children and
families.
Understanding partners'
levels and what they can contribute to a relationship allows
the council to avail itself of the community's skills and resources
to achieve the Child Development Plan's goals in a manner that
benefits everyone.
The matrix on the
following pages identifies each of the various partners, their
partner level(s), and some primary contributions.
The partner levels
are:
1. Strategic
- This applies to groups or organizations responsible for setting
policy and direction for child care/the child care system.
2. Tactical
- This applies to those groups or organizations that determine
what needs to be done based on the identified strategic decisions.
3. Operational
- This applies to the groups and organizations that implement
programs, services and/or activities for/within the child
care system.
4. Support
- This applies to groups and organizations that benefit
from or facilitate services/changes in the child care system.
|
Partner Level |
Contributions |
|
|
Strategic |
Tactical |
Operational |
Supportive |
|
|
|
Alta California Regional
Center |
X |
X |
X |
|
Provide Information
and Referral services, diagnosis and evaluation services, and
financial assistance to help purchase services. Provide out-of-home
placement and respite care. Connect people with public and private
services, and provide programs for people with developmental
disabilities |
|
California Division
of Community Care Licensing |
X |
X |
X |
|
Oversight, licensing,
information and resources related to child care |
|
Chambers of Commerce |
|
|
|
X |
Provide support for
strategies that engage the public |
|
Child Care Centers |
|
|
X |
|
Direct service child
care to the community |
|
Civic and Professional
Associations |
|
|
|
X |
Vehicle to raise awareness
and conduct outreach related to child care |
|
Faith-Based Community |
|
|
X |
X |
Resource information
point of contact, family programs for membership, and after-school
activities |
|
Family Child Care Homes |
|
|
X |
|
Direct service child
care to the community |
|
Head Start |
|
|
X |
|
Educational opportunities
in the home with a focus on pre-school children |
|
Lassen, Feather River,
and Sierra Colleges |
|
X |
X |
|
Assess and provide college
credit opportunities for child care providers |
|
Law Enforcement |
|
|
X |
X |
Outreach and safety
training |
|
Maternal, Child and
Adolescent Health |
X |
X |
X |
|
Identify health care
needs and resources for children and families |
|
Mountain Circle Family
Services |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Assess and determine
foster home status, make placement decisions, and provide transportation
and trainings |
|
Primary Health Care
Providers |
|
|
X |
X |
Provide referrals, CPR
and first-aid training and information, as well as direct medical
care |
|
Rainbow |
X |
X |
X |
|
Identify, refer and
set policy for special needs services across four counties |
|
Sierra County Board
of Education |
X |
|
|
X |
Provide a forum that
facilitates feedback regarding changes to the child care system,
and allocate resources and set policies, which impacts child
care systems |
|
Sierra County Board
of Supervisors |
X |
|
|
X |
Provide oversight to
SCCCC, approve actions and appoint SCCCC members |
|
Sierra County Child
Abuse Council |
|
X |
X |
X |
Provide parent training
regarding child care and provide mini-grants to child care providers,
car seat and bicycle helmet programs |
|
Sierra County Children
& Families Commission (Prop 10) |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Strategic planning,
service integration, child care retention funding, site development,
and direct service programs |
|
Sierra County Department
of Health and Human Services |
X |
X |
X |
X |
CalWORKs, provide a
child care payment program, CHDP, WIC, public health nurses,
public health clinics, well-baby clinics, Children's System of
Care, and Child Protective Services |
|
Sierra County Office
of Education |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Policy and special education
for children ages 0-5 and youth with special needs. Currently
developing a full-inclusion child care center, provide oversight
to SCCCC, approve actions and appoint SCCCC members |
|
Sierra Nevada Children's
Services |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Set payment plan policies,
resources and referral as well as contracting for child care
services and trainings, toy and resources lending library |
|
Sierra-Plumas School
District |
|
|
X |
X |
Provide data on free/reduced
lunches upon request and incorporates child development into
ROP |
|
Sierra-Plumas District
Board of Trustees |
X |
|
|
X |
Provide a forum that
facilitates feedback regarding changes to the child care system,
allocate resources and set policies, which impact child care
systems |
|
Volunteer Fire Departments |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Provide training, education,
and information regarding fire safety, and conduct fire inspections |
Strategies for Achieving Goals and Objectives
Strategies identify the specific programs, services
and projects to be pursued in order to achieve each objective.
After developing the goals and objectives for the Child Development
Plan, the council identified strategies to reach those goals.
In addition, promising practices from other counties and systems
were identified and reviewed for their applicability in Sierra
County. The resulting strategies are those best suited for Sierra
County.
The tables that follow
are organized according to the goals and objectives listed in
the previous section of the plan. Each objective includes the
intended strategies, the community partners which will need to
be involved for the strategy to be successfully implemented,
and the estimated costs and available resources for implementation.
Strategies shown
in bold text will be pursued during the first 12-month
implementation period (January December 2002).
|
FOCUS
AREA A: Collaboration Enhancing and Focusing Stakeholder
Efforts |
|
Goals |
Objectives
|
Strategies
|
A.1.
Collaboration among stakeholders will be enhanced and focused,
thereby improving outcomes for child care and the child care
system.
|
A.1.1. By Fall 2003, SCCCC will
work with all stakeholders to identify available resources/gaps,
and make recommendations for addressing identified needs.
|
a) Partner with Prop 10
to convene a Childrens Summit for all stakeholders in Fall
2002 to identify issues, roles/responsibilities, resources, and
collaborations. (Jan. '02-Oct. '02.)
b) Document outcomes of Children's Summit. Produce and
disseminate Summary Report. (Oct. '02 Dec. '02)
c) Conduct gaps analysis based
on Summit findings and develop a set of recommendations for addressing
gaps/needs. (Jan. '03 Aug. '03)
|
|
Costs & Resources: Cost is estimated at $5,000. SCCCC to
provide 50% funding with partners providing the other 50%. Resources
needed include child care, guest speakers, space, printed materials,
facilitators, media packets, and refreshments. |
|
Potential Partners: Prop 10; Sierra Child Abuse Council;
Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health (possibly for funding);
County Health and Human Services (possibly for funding); SCCCC;
Sierra Nevada Children's Services; child care providers; Sierra
County Office of Education; and, Mountain Circle Foster Care. |
|
FOCUS
AREA B: Quality Care Professional Development and Training |
|
Goals |
Objectives
|
Strategies
|
B.1.
The variety of quality trainings to providers will be broad and
flexible enough in order that all providers will participate.
|
B.1.1. By Fall 2002, a qualified
pool of substitute providers will be in place and available to
providers.
|
a) Partner with Sierra County
agencies to provide funds and training for individuals wanting
to become qualified entry-level substitutes. (Jan. '02
Aug. '02)
b) Explore viability of partnering with neighboring
counties to share a qualified pool of substitutes. (May '02-
Sep. '02)
|
|
Costs & Resources: Costs estimated at $10,000 at $10 to $12
per hour. Prop 10 and Sierra-Plumas School District. |
|
Potential Partners: Sierra County agencies (county and community);
Plumas, Nevada, Yuba, Butte, and Lassen counties; Prop 10; Sierra-Plumas
School District (ROP); and, potential substitutes. |
|
B.1.2. By Fall 2003, all child
care providers will be able to attend quality trainings.
|
a) Identify any additional
barriers (beyond substitutes) to attending trainings; document
and disseminate results to stakeholders. (Oct. '02 Feb.
'03)
b) Develop and implement plan
to address barriers identified through above strategy. (Mar.
'03 Sep. '03)
|
|
Costs & Resources: Costs estimated at $1,000 for postage,
paper, printing, advertising. Prop 10, SCCCC, Cascade Families
Opportunities, Inc. Head Start, and SNCS. |
|
Potential Partners: Prop 10; child care providers; SNCS; and
Cascade Families Opportunities, Inc. Head Start. |
B.2.
Child care providers will have the tools to meet the diverse
child and family needs within Sierra County.
|
B.2.1. By Spring 2002, all existing
providers will receive training in providing care for special
needs children and a process for providing ongoing technical
assistance and support will be in place.
|
a) Work with partners to
fund and provide training for existing providers in caring for
special needs children. (Jan. '02 May '02)
b) Outline process for delivering
ongoing technical assistance/support to providers caring for
special needs children; disseminate to partners and providers.
(Jan. '02 May '02)
|
|
Costs & Resources: Costs estimated at $2,000 for copying,
binders, first aid and CPR instruction, postage/mailing. |
|
Potential Partners: SNCS; Prop. 10; Alta Regional; Rainbow;
SCOE; Children's System of Care (DHHS). |
|
FOCUS
AREA C: Capacity/Retention Across all Types of Care Settings |
|
Goals |
Objectives
|
Strategies
|
C.1.
Child care providers will receive compensation/ benefits/incentives
that encourage and enable them to stay in the profession.
|
C.1.1. By Fall 2005, all providers
will engage in dialogue about compensation benefits.
|
a) Use existing forums/meetings
as mechanisms for dialoging with providers.
b) Make financial planning professionals available to providers
to provide specific information.
|
|
Costs & Resources: To be determined by June 2005. |
|
Potential Partners: Providers, families, Prop 10, SNCS, SCOE. |
|
C.1.2. By Fall 2004, SCCCC will
produce and disseminate a report to the community that documents
the beneficial impact of the child care profession in Sierra
County.
|
a) Conduct salary compensation
study for Sierra County providers.
b) Compare Sierra County provider compensation with other,
similar counties.
c) Perform an Economic Impact Study of child care industry
upon Sierra County.
d) Produce Summary Report for above strategies, with recommendations
for closing gaps and increasing compensation where indicated.
e) Educate community about Summary Report findings/recommendations
through various mechanisms (media, meetings, etc.)
|
|
Costs & Resources: To be determined by June 2004. |
|
Potential Partners: Providers, families, Prop 10, SNCS, SCOE. |
|
C.1.3. Beginning in 2003, SCCCC
will engage in conversation and advocacy activities at least
four times per year with funding sources, providers and other
key stakeholders about new /ongoing retention efforts at the
local and state levels.
|
a) Use existing communication
channels and forums (Prop 10, SNCS, etc.) to update and inform
various stakeholders.
|
|
Costs & Resources: To be determined by January 2003. |
|
Potential Partners: Prop. 10; SNCS; SCOE; Child Abuse Council. |
|
FOCUS
AREA D: Council Development / Effectiveness |
|